×
Detail Form
We will send your result on your email id and phone no. please fill detail
1.
A deployment professional is asked to clean up several failed events that belong to a long running business process in a clustered WebSphere Process Server environment. These failed events were created as a result of an identified outage of the backend database. Several instances of this business process were created during this outage and have been deleted. What corrective action should the deployment professional take to clean up these failed events?
2.
The deployment professional is in the process of implementing security in WebSphere Process Server by configuring LDAP. In the Configuration tab of standalone LDAP registry page, the deployment professional has chosen utomatically generated server identify?option so that the applicationstandalone LDAP registry page, the deployment professional has chosen ?utomatically generated server identify?option so that the application server generates the server identity that is used for internal process communication. At the end of the configuration, the deployment professional wants to change the server identify. Which of the following options is valid?
3.
A deployment professional is given the task of installing WebSphere Process Seiver in multiple Linux environments and decides to automate the process using silent install. During the installation process, several issues were encountered. What is the cause of the issues?
4.
A deployment professional has been asked to review the backup plan of a WebSphere Process Seiver (WPS) Network Deployment installation with a standard Remote Messaging and Remote Support two node cell. The deployment professional has noticed that the databases are backed up on a different cycle and separate from the transaction logs. Predict the consequences during a database recovery from backup.
5.
A development team has scheduled a new series of test cycles for their applications. For the planned load test the following requirements have been specified by the team to complete the test and identify runtime problems. The team must monitor the number of failed asynchronous invocations; status of the messaging engines and deployed application modules. Which approach will support the team to gather the required information during the test cycle?
6.
A company has severe problems with two SCA modules being deployed on a production environment. The cluster consists of multiple nodes and many other applications are deployed already. After a first investigation of the problem, the root cause seems to be related to inter-module SCA invocations. The problem must be solved as soon as possible with a minimal effect on other applications. Which approach should a deployment professional recommend to troubleshoot the problem on a production environment?
7.
A deployment professional is performing a review of the audit and logging practices being used. One of the items under review is the current level of logging configured for the Human Task Manager. The site database administrator requires that any changes made which affect the amount and type of data being stored to the database must be reviewed and approved prior to implementation. Which of the following log settings would impact the data stored to the database?
8.
A deployment professional of a WebSphere Process Server Network Deployment environment has installed and configured Business Space. The deployment professional now needs to create a second cluster and have access to both from Business Space. What must be done to support this configuration?
9.
A customer new to WebSphere Process Seiver has promoted some Java developers to the WebSphere Integration Developer team. The developers want to monitor the use of some of the non-technology adapters (e.g., SAP and JD Edwards). The developers have started to design a database schema to persist the metrics\ and develop Java code to track the adapter usage. What should the deployment professional suggest to the WebSphere Integration Developer team?
10.
In a company all the applications deployed in a WebSphere Process Seiver network deployment environment extensively leverage asynchronous messaging with JMS bindings. There is a requirement to resubmit the messages in case of infrastructure failures or planned shutdown. What is the suggested message reliability level that could be proposed in this situation?