Aptitude Critical Thinking Arguments

Choose whether the argument is strong or weak for the statement below. Should employees who have over five years of experience in the company be bound by law to give employers an advance notice of 60 days upon resignation? Argument- Yes. Research has shown that requiring employees to give advance notice forces them to rethink their choice, which often causes them to change their minds. This makes workplaces more stable environments, especially when it comes to valuable experienced employees.

Choose whether the argument is strong or weak for the statement below. Should employees who have over five years of experience in the company be bound by law to give employers an advance notice of 60 days upon resignation? Argument-Yes, senior employees are a great asset to a workplace and employers need sufficient time to find them an adequate replacement.

Choose whether the argument is strong or weak for the statement below. Should employees who have over five years of experience in the company be bound by law to give employers an advance notice of 60 days upon resignation?
Argument- No - employees who have resigned are less efficient than their co-workers.

Choose whether the argument is strong or weak for the statement below. Should employees who have over five years of experience in the company be bound by law to give employers an advance notice of 60 days upon resignation?
Argument- No. People should be able to leave their workplace whenever they want.

Choose whether the argument is strong or weak for the statement below. Should employees who have over five years of experience in the company be bound by law to give employers an advance notice of 60 days upon resignation?
Argument- No. Labour laws such as this one that protect employers discourage employees, making them less efficient in the workplace.

Choose whether the argument is strong or weak for the statement below. Should the government station speed cameras alongside main roads to reduce the amount of fatal car accidents?
Argument-No, stationing speed cameras alongside main roads promotes a false sense of security.

Choose whether the argument is strong or weak for the statement below. Should the government station speed cameras alongside main roads to reduce the amount of fatal car accidents?
Argument-No, research has shown that a significant percentage of fatal car accidents are not solely a result of speeding.

Choose whether the argument is strong or weak for the statement below. Should the government station speed cameras alongside main roads to reduce the amount of fatal car accidents?
Argument-No- speed cameras, especially those which employ automatic number plate recognition, are commonly used to establish a mass surveillance of vehicle movement.

Choose whether the argument is strong or weak for the statement below. Should the government station speed cameras alongside main roads to reduce the amount of fatal car accidents?
Argument-Yes, main roads with speed cameras tend to have fewer fatal accidents than main roads with no speed cameras.

Choose whether the argument is strong or weak for the statement below. Should the government station speed cameras alongside main roads to reduce the amount of fatal car accidents?
Argument-Yes, speeding is the main cause of fatal car accidents and speed cameras have been proven to reduce average speed by 10%.