VPRN 300 is configured on Node 4. BGP is being used as the PE-CE routing protocol. Node 2 is the CE router. The BGP session is not established between Node 4 and Node 2. What is missing in the configuration?
VPRN 300 is configured between Node 3 and Node 4. Node 4 receives VPN routes from Node 3 and imports them into the VRF. The entire route-table is displayed below for VPRN 300 on Node 4. When attempting a ping from VPRN 300 on Node 4 to 30.1.1.1 the ping fails. A ping from Node 3 within VPRN 300 to 30.1.1.1 is successful. What is the cause of the problem?
VPRN 300 is configured on Node 3 and Node 4 with LDP and MP-BGP. No route can be found in the VPRN 300 routing table on both Nodes. What is the cause of the problem?
Two routers are physically connected to each other over Ethernet port 1/1/1. Review the configuration information shown below. What state should the OSPF neighbor be in?
Two routers are physically connected to each other over Ethernet port 1/1/1. Review the configuration information below. What state should the OSPF neighbor be in?
Two routers are physically connected running ISIS. ISIS L2 adjacency is up and running but L1 adjacency is not up. Review the configuration information shown below: Which of the following statement best describe the cause of the problem? Select one answer only.
Two routers are physically connected to each other with ISIS configured. No ISIS adjacency can be found on both routers. Ping works fine on the local and the remote interface addresses on both routers. Review the confguration information shown below. Which of the following statements best describe the cause of the problem? Select one answer only.